1. Multiple Paths to Knowledge<div><br></div><div><div><div>A. INTERNATIONAL CRISIS BEHAVIOR (ICB) PROJECT: OVERVIEW</div><div>Origins </div><div>Colleagues, Coders and Advisers </div><div>Rationale and Methods </div><div>Objectives </div><div>Formative Publications (1977-1980) </div><div>Case Studies – Qualitative Analysis </div><div>Data Sets and Aggregate Analysis</div><div><br></div><div>B. MILLENNIAL REFLECTIONS ON CRISIS AND CONFLICT</div><div>Advocates and Critics</div><div>Rationale</div><div>Diversity in International Studies</div><div><br></div><div>C. INTELLECTUAL ODYSSEY: PHASES, THEMES, CONCEPTS </div><div>Phases and Themes</div><div> Political Leadership and Charisma (Odyssey I)</div><div> Dynamics of the Arab/Israel Conflict (Odyssey II)</div><div> Interstate Crises and Conflicts (Odyssey III) </div><div>Concepts </div><div> Subordinate State System</div><div> Foreign Policy System</div><div> International System</div><div> Foreign Policy Crisis</div><div> International Crisis</div><div> Unified Model of Crisis</div><div> Crisis Severity</div><div> Crisis Impact</div><div> Protracted Conflict</div><div> Polycentrism</div></div><div><br></div>2. Theory I: Core Concepts and Systems<div><div><br></div><div>A. CORE CONCEPTS</div><div>International Crisis and Protracted Conflict</div><div>Severity and Impact</div><div><br><div>B. SYSTEM AND CRISIS</div><div>International System</div><div>Systemic Crisis</div><div>Berlin Blockade Crisis 1948-49</div><div>India/Pakistan Crisis over Kashmir 1965-66</div><div>Severity and Impact </div><div>Unit-System Linkages</div><div><br></div></div><div>3. Theory II: Unified Model of Crisis (UMC) and the ICB Framework</div><div><br></div><div><div>A. UNIFIED MODEL OF CRISIS</div><div>Conceptual Guidelines: Overview </div><div>Onset Phase--Pre-Crisis Period: Hypotheses on Onset; Crisis Onset Model Escalation Phase--Crisis Period: Hypotheses on Escalation </div><div>De-Escalation Phase--End Crisis Period: Hypotheses on De-Escalation</div><div>Impact Phase--Post-Crisis Period: Hypotheses on Impact</div><div><br></div><div>B. CHANGES IN ICB STRUCTURE</div><div>Recent Additions to Crisis-Conflict Project</div><div>Overview of Findings </div></div><div><br></div></div>4. General Findings: Foreign Policy Crises<div><br></div><div><div><div>Dataset: 29 Cases</div><div>Context Dimensions </div><div>Methodology in Case Studies: An Unresolved Debate</div><div>General Findings on Attributes of Foreign Policy Crises: </div><div> Trigger </div><div> Triggering Entity </div><div> Duration </div><div> Decisions </div><div> Decision-Makers </div><div> Attitudinal Prism </div><div> Values </div><div>Findings on Coping: Crisis Management</div><div> Information Processing</div><div> Consultation</div><div> Decisional Forum</div><div> Search for, and Consideration of, Alternatives</div><div>Findings on System Structures</div><div> Multipolarity </div><div> Bipolarity </div><div> Bipolycentrism</div><div> Unipolycentrism</div><div>Coping with Foreign Policy Crises: New Evidence Confronts Conventional Wisdom Hypotheses on Effects of Time and Impact of Stress</div><div> Cognitive Dimension </div><div> Decisional Dimension </div><div> Shared Response to Stress </div><div>Explanation – Commonality in Coping with High Stress </div><div>Stress-Behavior Relationship: Evidence from 29 Foreign Policy Crises </div><div>Test of Neo-Realism: Evidence from 29 Foreign Policy Crises</div></div><div><br></div></div>5. Theory III: Interstate Conflicts<br></div><div><div><div>Conflict Resolution Model </div><div>Basic Causes of Conflict Resolution</div><div> Collective Exhaustion</div><div> Changes in Balance of Capability</div><div> Domestic Pressures for Conflict Resolution External Pressures for Conflict Resolution </div><div> Reduction in Discordant Objectives </div><div> Reduction in Conflict-Sustaining Acts</div><div>Perceptual Calculus</div><div>Catalyst</div><div>Hypotheses on Conflict Resolution</div></div><div><br></div></div><div>6. Select Case Study Findings on Interstate Conflict: Africa and Americas</div><div><br></div><div><div>A. AFRICA</div><div>Chad/Libya </div><div>Ethiopia/Somalia</div><div>Western Sahara </div><div><br></div><div>B. AMERICAS</div><div>Costa Rica/Nicaragua<div><br></div></div></div><div>7. Select Case Study Findings on Interstate Conflict: Asia</div><div><br></div><div><div>Afghanistan/Pakistan </div><div>China/Vietnam</div><div><br></div><div>8. Select Case Study Findings on Interstate Conflict: Europe and the Middle East</div><br></div><div><div>A. EUROPE</div><div>Finland/Russia-USSR</div><div>Poland/Russia-USSR</div><div><br></div><div>B. MIDDLE EAST </div><div>Iran/Iraq</div></div><div><br></div><div>9. Select Case Study Findings on Interstate Conflict: Inter-Region</div><div><br></div><div>Georgia/Russia-USSR</div><div>Inter-Korea </div><div>North Vietnam/U.S. </div><div>Taiwan Strait</div><div><br></div><div>10. What Have We Learned about Interstate Conflict?</div><div><br></div><div><div>Hypotheses and Evidence on Conflict Onset </div><div>Hypotheses and Evidence on Conflict Persistence </div><div>Hypotheses and Evidence on Conflict Resolution<div><br>11. Critique of International Studies</div><div><br></div><div><div>A. SHORTCOMINGS</div><div>Intolerance of Competing Paradigms, Models, Methods, Findings </div><div>Closed-Mind Mentality</div><div>Tendency to Research Fashions Retreat from Science in IR, IS, WP</div><div>Low Value placed on Cumulation of Knowledge</div><div></div><div>B. FLAWED DICHOTOMIES<div>Theory vs. History as Approaches to Knowledge<div>Deductive vs. Inductive Paths to Theory </div><div>Horizontal (breadth) vs. Vertical (depth) Focus of Inquiry </div><div>Aggregate Data vs. Case Study Methods of Analysis </div><div>Large ‘N’ vs. Small ‘N’ clusters of data </div><div>System vs. Actor as the optimal Level of Analysis </div><div>Rational Calculus vs. Psychological Constraints on choice and the related divide (Reality vs. Perceptions as key to explain state behavior) Neo-Realism vs. Neo-Institutionalism or Constructivism as the correct Paradigm for the Study of World Politics </div><div><br></div><div>C. FINAL WORDS</div></div></div></div></div>